FarmLabs Logo

Stealth Automation Infographic

Farm smarter, not harder — with FarmLabs.

The Blueprint of Human-like Automation

A deep dive into a client-side tool designed to automate blockchain interactions for Researchers, Developers, Protocol testing, testnet farmers and airdrop eligibility , with a focus on simulating organic, human-like activity.

5

Recipient Modes

From dynamic address pools to self-interaction, offering diverse targeting strategies.

5+

Randomization Factors

Simulates human behavior by randomizing amounts, delays, wallets, chains, and gas fees.

Supported Wallets

Load an unlimited number of private keys to scale your operations effortlessly.

The Core Engine: How It Works

The script follows a logical, configurable flow to execute its tasks. From initialization to the final transaction, each step is designed for automation and control.

1. Connect & Load Wallets
2. Configure Settings (Recipients, Delays, Amounts)
3. Start Interaction Process

4. Execution Loop (Repeats)

Select Chain
Select Wallet
Choose Action
Execute Tx
5. Monitor via Dashboard & Logs

Key Performance Indicators

Action Distribution

This chart shows the typical probability of the script performing a 'Send' transaction versus choosing to remain 'Idle' for an action, a key feature for simulating non-robotic behavior.

Sample Wallet Balances (ETH)

A snapshot of balances across multiple loaded wallets. The script provides real-time updates to this data as transactions are confirmed on the network.

Deconstructing the Digital Fingerprint

Platforms create a unique identity by collecting various data points from your browser and device—such as graphics capabilities, installed fonts, and system settings. This "fingerprint" is powerful because it persists even if you clear cookies. To evade detection, a script must address multiple, independent fingerprinting vectors simultaneously to create a consistent, plausible profile.

Anatomy of a Fingerprint

A radar chart illustrates how various data points (like Canvas, WebGL, and Fonts) contribute to a user's unique digital signature. The larger the area, the more unique the user.

Crafting a Coherent Persona

Randomizing individual attributes is not enough; modern anti-bot systems detect inconsistent profiles. The key is to build a plausible but fake identity. This flowchart outlines the logic for generating a believable digital persona that can evade statistical analysis.

🖥️

1. Select Realistic Base Profile

(e.g., Chrome on Windows 11)

🛡️

2. Choose Plausible Hardware

(e.g., Common GPU, 4 CPU Cores)

🎲

3. Randomize Attributes Logically

(e.g., Add noise to Canvas, spoof fonts)

👻

4. Output: Coherent, Spoofed Fingerprint

Layer 2: The Shifting Footprint (IP Rotation)

Your IP address is a primary tracker. Strategically rotating IPs through proxies is fundamental, but the type of proxy matters significantly. Routinely changing IP addresses is critical for bypassing IP-based blocking and rate limits. However, IP rotation alone is not a silver bullet. Anti-bot systems correlate IP changes with other persistent identifiers, like device fingerprints. True evasion requires a synergistic approach, combining IP masking with coherent fingerprint spoofing to present a genuinely human-like profile across multiple detection vectors.

Proxy Effectiveness Comparison

Residential proxies, which use real IP addresses from ISPs, are far more effective at bypassing sophisticated anti-bot systems than datacenter proxies.

This chart shows the efficacy of different proxy types, highlighting why residential and mobile IPs are preferred for advanced evasion.

95%
Success Rate

High-quality residential proxies can achieve up to a 95% success rate against advanced bot detection, making them essential for high-security targets.

The 'Humanization' Engine

To avoid being flagged as a bot, the script incorporates several layers of randomization. This engine ensures that the script's activity appears organic and unpredictable. Bots are often caught by their unnatural timing. Human reaction times follow skewed distributions, not fixed intervals. Scripts must mimic this organic inconsistency to appear genuine.

Randomized Gas Payments

Instead of using a fixed gas price, the script calculates a variable fee for each transaction, staying within a user-defined multiplier of the current network average to mimic human bidding behavior.

⏱️

Random Delays (Log-normal)

Waits for a random duration (e.g., 10-30 seconds) between actions, drawn from a log-normal distribution for more human-like timing.

💸

Random Amounts

Sends a variable amount of ETH within a specified range.

🔗

Random Chain & Wallet

Picks a random wallet and a random blockchain network for each session.

🎲

Per-Wallet Probability Jitter

Each wallet's action probabilities (send, idle, balance check) subtly vary from global settings.

⚙️

Simulated Errors & Retries

Introduces occasional simulated transaction failures, followed by exponential backoff retries.

Simulating Human Behavior

A comparison of robotic, fixed-interval delays versus human-like, log-normal distributed delays, demonstrating the importance of natural timing.

Natural Inputs

Human mouse movements are curved and have variable speed. Typing has pauses and errors. Robotic, perfectly straight movements and constant-speed typing are dead giveaways.

Robotic Mouse Path

A direct, straight line from A to B.

Human-like Mouse Path

A curved, slightly erratic path using Bezier curves.

The Web3 Frontier: Evading On-Chain Detection

In Web3, all transactions are public. This creates a new challenge: your script's entire history is auditable on the blockchain. Evasion is not just about avoiding blocks, but about creating a plausible on-chain persona that doesn't scream "bot" through its transaction patterns.

On the transparent world of the blockchain, your transaction *patterns* become your new fingerprint.

~80% of blockchain transactions are automated.

Bot vs. Human NFT Trading

A bot might flip the same asset repeatedly with mechanical precision. A human collector, by contrast, shows more diverse activity, accumulates assets over time, and interacts at irregular intervals, mimicking organic market behavior.

A comparison of common NFT trading patterns for automated bots versus human users, emphasizing diversification and irregular timing.

Mastering Blockchain Challenges: Exponential Backoff

Failed blockchain transactions can be costly due to gas fees. Instead of constant, immediate retries (a clear bot-like pattern), use Exponential Backoff. This strategy significantly increases the delay after each failure, mimicking a patient human and reducing network spam, ultimately improving success rates and stealth.

This chart visually demonstrates the increasing wait time between retry attempts, a key human-like behavior for robust Web3 interaction.

The Resilient Transaction Flow

Blockchain interactions are costly and irreversible. Failed transactions still incur gas fees. Robust error handling with exponential backoff isn't just good practice—it's a financial necessity and mimics a patient human.

1. Build Transaction
2. Estimate Gas & Set Slippage
3. Sign & Send
4. On Failure? Use Exponential Backoff & Retry

Recipient Strategy

The script offers multiple modes for selecting transaction recipients, allowing for a wide range of interaction patterns.

🔍

Dynamic Pool

Scans recent blocks for active wallets (EOAs) and adds them to a recipient pool.

🎯

Fixed Address

Sends all transactions to a single, predetermined address.

📝

Custom List

Uses a user-provided list of addresses for transactions.

📄

Predefined List

Loads recipients from an externally hosted or uploaded CSV file.

🤝

Self-Interact

Loaded wallets send transactions to each other, creating an internal ecosystem.

↪️

Fallback Logic

If the Dynamic Pool is empty, it automatically falls back to Self-Interact mode.

Deep Dive: External Resource

Explore further details and documentation on transaction Interaction and related topics through this embedded resource.

⚠️

A Critical Security Notice

This is a client-side application. Handling private keys in a web browser is **extremely risky**. This tool is intended for educational and testing purposes **on test networks only**. Never input mainnet private keys or keys associated with wallets holding real assets. The developer assumes no responsibility for any loss of funds.